historic china-california trade revenue
Historical Trade Trends
Early Trade: Trade between the U.S. and China dates back to the post-American Revolution period, when American merchants sought opportunities in Chinese markets for goods like tea, porcelain, and silk8.
Growth Over Decades: California's exports to China have grown substantially, nearly tripling from $5.4 billion in 2003 to $15.092 billion in 2024, making China one of California's top trading partners74.
Recent Trade Data
Exports: In 2022, California exported $18.15 billion worth of goods to China, with leading categories including computer and electronic products ($4.018 billion), non-electrical machinery ($3.676 billion), and chemicals ($2.15 billion)1. By 2024, exports had decreased slightly to $15.092 billion4.
Imports: Imports from China to California were valued at $147.6 billion in 2022, dominated by computer and electronic products ($48.2 billion), electrical equipment, and apparel1. This trade imbalance contributed to a $107.668 billion deficit with China in 20244.
Services Trade: Services exports from California to China have grown significantly since 2010, increasing by 175% compared to a 65% increase for the rest of the world6. Chinese students, tourists, and business travelers contributed $2.2 billion to California's economy in 20196.
Investment Dynamics
Chinese Foreign Direct Investment (FDI): Between 2000 and 2011, California attracted 156 Chinese investment deals worth $1.3 billion, creating jobs and tax revenues5. In 2020, Chinese FDI supported nearly 20,000 jobs in California across sectors like manufacturing and education1.
Shift in Strategy: Recent years have seen reduced Chinese imports due to U.S.-China trade tensions and tariffs, with some trade diverted through Mexico instead of California ports3.
Challenges and Opportunities
Economic Rivalry: Texas has emerged as a competitor for trade dollars previously flowing through California due to shifts in U.S.-China trade policies3.
Future Outlook: Despite geopolitical tensions, optimism remains for renewed investment and trade growth between California and China as both economies adapt to changing global conditions6.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/historic-china-california-trad-
ceDAHWrGQ825wSm6KKuylA
proportion of california gdp were china imports pre-tariff
Before the imposition of tariffs, Chinese imports represented a significant portion of California's economy. In 2024, California imported $509 billion worth of goods, with nearly 30% of these imports originating from China23. This equates to approximately $152.7 billion in imports from China.
California's total GDP in 2024 was estimated at $4.6 trillion, meaning Chinese imports accounted for roughly 3.3% of the state's GDP pre-tariff25.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/proportion-of-california-gdp-w-1
UJ8I9GLR2O05vo0yGB55g
the gavin newsom open trade doctrine with china
Governor Gavin Newsom's "open trade doctrine" with China and other international partners is a strategic response to President Donald Trump's recent tariff hikes, which have triggered global economic instability and retaliatory measures from key U.S. trading partners.
Key Elements of Newsom's Doctrine
Strategic Partnerships: Newsom has directed his administration to pursue bilateral trade agreements with countries imposing retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods, encouraging exemptions for California-made products. This includes agricultural exports like almonds, pistachios, and wine, which are vital to the state's economy123.
Global Outreach: California has established trade offices worldwide, including in China, Japan, and Mexico. Newsom aims to strengthen ties with international partners to protect California's industries from the fallout of federal trade policies7.
Focus on Resilience: Newsom emphasizes California's role as the fifth-largest economy globally, advocating for fair and open trade practices that safeguard manufacturers, farmers, and workers in the state26.
Challenges and Risks
Limited Authority: Economists argue that Newsom's ability to bypass federal tariffs is constrained by constitutional limits on state-level foreign relations. His efforts may yield marginal benefits but cannot fully insulate California from the broader impacts of a potential trade war5.
Retaliatory Measures: Despite Newsom's outreach, China has reduced U.S. film imports—a significant blow to Hollywood—and threatened further countermeasures against escalating U.S. restrictions6.
Economic Vulnerabilities: California's reliance on diversified supply chains and its prominence in agriculture, tech, and entertainment make it particularly susceptible to tariff-induced price hikes and disruptions5.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/the-gavin-newsom-open-trade-do-az_
7GYkoS5KTrlcIDdRSfw
why has china effectively shined on gavin newsom's open trade offer
China has effectively dismissed Gavin Newsom's open trade offer for several reasons tied to broader geopolitical and economic tensions:
Retaliation Against U.S. Tariffs: China's decision to reduce U.S. film imports and impose retaliatory tariffs aligns with its broader response to President Donald Trump's aggressive tariff policies. Despite Newsom's efforts to exempt California-made goods, Beijing appears unwilling to make exceptions, viewing the trade conflict as a national issue rather than one tied to individual states137.
Limited Leverage: While California is a significant trading partner with China, accounting for $166 billion in two-way trade, Newsom's ability to influence international trade policy is constrained by federal authority. Experts suggest that his call for exemptions may be more symbolic than practical, aimed at highlighting California's distinct economic interests rather than directly altering China's stance910.
Skepticism Over Newsom's Ties: Newsom's past connections with China, including initiatives like ChinaSF that facilitated Chinese investments in California, have raised concerns about his relationship with CCP-linked entities. These ties may have complicated perceptions of his trade diplomacy efforts, especially amid heightened scrutiny of U.S.-China relations68.
Escalating Trade War Dynamics: The intensifying trade war between the U.S. and China has overshadowed Newsom's overtures. China's firm stance against U.S. tariffs signals its unwillingness to differentiate between states like California and federal policies, prioritizing national interests over regional appeals37.
Ultimately, China's dismissal of Newsom's offer reflects the complexities of global trade politics and the limitations of state-level diplomacy in resolving international disputes.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/why-has-china-effectively-shin-u.R.nzMlRv.G6SlcDtlwew
china summarily dismisses gavin newsom's open trade doctrine
China has dismissed California Governor Gavin Newsom's open trade doctrine, which sought to exempt California-made goods from retaliatory tariffs amid escalating U.S.-China trade tensions. Despite Newsom's efforts to position California as a stable and independent trading partner, Beijing has responded unfavorably.
Key developments include:
: Following President Donald Trump's tariff hikes on Chinese imports, China imposed a 34% tariff on U.S. goods starting April 10, 2025. This move directly counters Newsom's appeal for California-made products to be spared from such measures15.
: China announced a reduction in U.S. film imports, citing the Trump administration's tariffs as the primary reason. This decision undermines Newsom's outreach, given California's central role in the film industry2.
: Newsom emphasized California’s economic significance as the fifth-largest economy globally and its leadership in agriculture and manufacturing. He urged global partners to view California as distinct from Washington, D.C., and to maintain strong trade relations with the state14.
Despite these efforts, China's Ministry of Commerce warned it would continue countermeasures if U.S. restrictions persist, signaling that Newsom's proposals have had little impact on easing tensions2.
https://www.perplexity.ai/search/china-summarily-dismisses-gavi-
VAwltG49Qjeksq5ifpgM9w
the gavin newsom open trade doctrine was never realistic
Governor Gavin Newsom's recent initiative to establish independent trade agreements and exempt California-made products from retaliatory tariffs has faced widespread criticism, with many deeming it unrealistic and legally unfeasible.
Key Points of Criticism:
Federal Authority Over Trade: Critics argue that Newsom lacks the legal authority to negotiate international trade agreements or override federal tariffs, which are governed by the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. His plan is seen as political grandstanding rather than a viable solution124.
Economic Challenges in California: Many have pointed out that Newsom should focus on pressing state issues like homelessness, crime, affordability, and regulatory burdens instead of attempting international dealmaking. California has been ranked poorly for business climate, with businesses and jobs leaving the state16.
Impact of Trump’s Tariffs: President Donald Trump's "Liberation Day" tariffs impose significant duties on imports, including 34% on Chinese goods and 20% on EU products. Newsom’s request for exemptions for California products has been criticized as unlikely to succeed, given the global retaliatory measures already in place.
California's Economic Role: While California is the fifth-largest economy globally and a major contributor to U.S. GDP, critics argue that this does not grant the state unilateral power to bypass federal trade policies or negotiate independently with foreign nations
Newsom's efforts to position California as a stable trading partner amid a turbulent tariff environment have drawn skepticism from both political opponents and economic analysts. Many view his doctrine as impractical given the constraints of federal authority and the complexities of international trade dynamics124.